Live
Breaking
3h ago Cryptocurrency 3rd Bitcoin Reorg in a Month: Top 2 Pools Hold 44% [2026] 4h ago Gaming Steam Frame Invites Go Out: 72-Hour Buy Window [2026] 4h ago Gaming Bungie Denies Merging 2 IPs: Marathon, Destiny Split [2026] 5h ago Hardware & Chips AMD Preps 10% Price Hike, Spares Ryzen for Now [2026] 6h ago AI & Machine Learning GLM-5.3 Finds Cursor Flaw, Triggers $10B Rule [2026] 6h ago AI & Machine Learning DOSE Benchmark: Voice AI Mispronounces 1 in 3 Drugs [2026] 9h ago Gaming Valve: Steam Buyer Data Safe After CEVA Hit 10 Firms [2026] 9h ago Gaming Epic Kills MetaHuman Creator Web App: Nov. 5 [2026] 11h ago AI & Machine Learning OpenAI’s 2 Models Escaped Sandbox via Real Zero-Day [2026] 11h ago Cloud Computing Kubernetes Network Policy: 12 Steps to Zero Trust [2026] 11h ago AI & Machine Learning Hugging Face Hack Anatomy: 17,600 Actions, 4.5 Days [2026] 12h ago Cybersecurity 3 Agencies Expose Iran’s CHOSEN BRICK Spyware [2026] 13h ago Esports Is Steam Down? Build a Status Checker: 11 Steps [2026] 14h ago Gaming Sweeney Blasts EU’s Under-13 Social Media Ban [2026] 3h ago Cryptocurrency 3rd Bitcoin Reorg in a Month: Top 2 Pools Hold 44% [2026] 4h ago Gaming Steam Frame Invites Go Out: 72-Hour Buy Window [2026] 4h ago Gaming Bungie Denies Merging 2 IPs: Marathon, Destiny Split [2026] 5h ago Hardware & Chips AMD Preps 10% Price Hike, Spares Ryzen for Now [2026] 6h ago AI & Machine Learning GLM-5.3 Finds Cursor Flaw, Triggers $10B Rule [2026] 6h ago AI & Machine Learning DOSE Benchmark: Voice AI Mispronounces 1 in 3 Drugs [2026] 9h ago Gaming Valve: Steam Buyer Data Safe After CEVA Hit 10 Firms [2026] 9h ago Gaming Epic Kills MetaHuman Creator Web App: Nov. 5 [2026] 11h ago AI & Machine Learning OpenAI’s 2 Models Escaped Sandbox via Real Zero-Day [2026] 11h ago Cloud Computing Kubernetes Network Policy: 12 Steps to Zero Trust [2026] 11h ago AI & Machine Learning Hugging Face Hack Anatomy: 17,600 Actions, 4.5 Days [2026] 12h ago Cybersecurity 3 Agencies Expose Iran’s CHOSEN BRICK Spyware [2026] 13h ago Esports Is Steam Down? Build a Status Checker: 11 Steps [2026] 14h ago Gaming Sweeney Blasts EU’s Under-13 Social Media Ban [2026]
NewsroomLive
Today19 new
Archive817 stories
Last filed3h ago
Languages10
UTC07:39:39
Top Story Cryptocurrency

3rd Bitcoin Reorg in a Month: Top 2 Pools Hold 44% [2026]

Bitcoin's blockchain briefly split in two on September 11, 2026, when SpiderPool and AntPool each mined a valid block at height 966,500 within seconds of each other. The network settled the dispute the way it always…

3h ago  ·  Sep 18, 2026 Read the brief

The Desks

// editorial departments

Latest

// fresh from the editors

More from the desks

// keep digging
// about

About Shattered.io

This domain has been home to the SHAttered SHA-1 collision project since 2017, and is now a hub for cryptography, security and privacy reporting. The full origin story of the project, the two proof PDFs and the research credits live below.

The SHAttered project — origin, proof files and research credits

On 23 February 2017, researchers at CWI Amsterdam and Google showed the world the first real collision for the SHA-1 hash function. The project was called SHAttered, and this domain has been its home ever since. The two files that prove the break are still here to download.

What a collision actually is

A cryptographic hash takes any file and returns a short fixed-length fingerprint. The promise is simple: change a single bit of the file and the fingerprint changes too, and no two different files should ever share one. A collision breaks that promise. It is a pair of distinct inputs that produce the exact same hash. For a function used to sign software, certificates and documents, a collision is not a curiosity. It is a crack in the foundation.

What SHAttered produced

The team did not just argue that SHA-1 was weak on paper. They built the evidence. Two PDF files, visibly different and carrying different content, share one identical SHA-1 value: 38762cf7f55934b34d179ae6a4c80cadccbb7f0a. Run either file through SHA-1 and the answer matches. Run them through SHA-256 and the answer differs, which is how anyone can confirm they are genuinely two separate files.

What the attack cost

The break was expensive, and that was part of the point. Producing the collision took roughly nine quintillion SHA-1 computations, the work of about 6,500 CPU-years and 110 GPU-years run in parallel. That scale kept the attack out of reach for a casual attacker in 2017, yet it ran thousands of times faster than trying every possibility by brute force. The direction of travel was clear: the cost would only fall.

Why SHA-1 had to retire

Once a working collision exists, trust in a hash erodes quickly. Within months the result pushed browsers, certificate authorities and version-control systems to drop SHA-1 for anything security-sensitive. Git added collision detection. TLS certificates signed with SHA-1 were phased out. The lesson reached far past one algorithm: a function can look safe for years and still fall the moment the maths and the hardware line up.

The research and the people behind it

SHAttered was the work of Marc Stevens and Pierre Karpman at CWI Amsterdam, together with Elie Bursztein, Ange Albertini and Yarik Markov at Google. It built on years of earlier cryptanalysis of the SHA-1 design. The full technical paper that documents the method is preserved here.

Beyond the collision

The same questions that drove SHAttered run through everything we cover here: how hashing works, where it is used, and how systems prove they have not cheated. These guides pick up where the research leaves off.

What you'll find on shattered.io today